1. [quiz_q] The sender told the messenger to bring from the window, and the messenger brought from the cupboard. Who is liable?
26. [quiz_exp] The messenger deviated from the sender's instructions and thus nullified the mission; the liability for misappropriation is on him.
Question 2
2. [quiz_q] In which case is the eater the only one liable, even with a messenger?
27. [quiz_exp] In Halacha 2, it is stated that for Temple sacrifices there is an additional prohibition, thus the liability for misappropriation through a messenger does not apply, and the eater himself is liable.
Question 3
3. [quiz_q] What is the law if the sender remembers the coin is dedicated before it reaches the grocer, and the messenger does not remember?
28. [quiz_exp] The sender is already intentional and thus not liable for misappropriation, while the messenger who acts mistakenly bears the obligation.
Question 4
4. [quiz_q] A sacred coin mixed in a wallet. How do we permit using the money?
29. [quiz_exp] Halacha 6 establishes intentional desecration/transference of sanctity: 'In any place where the prutah... its sanctity shall be transferred to this.'
Question 5
5. [quiz_q] A person misappropriates less than the value of a prutah intentionally. What is his obligation according to the chapter?
30. [quiz_exp] In Halacha 8: Less than a prutah obligates the return of the principal only; there is no fifth and no sacrifice, and it seems there are also no lashes.