What is the ruling? A person benefited from a half a pruta from sacred property and then benefited again after three years. What is the law?
Halacha D states Halacha D states that combination for misuse can occur even after many years when it involves a single concealment.
Question 2
What is the principle? What is the principle in halacha regarding land that was consecrated?
Halacha H states Halacha H states that misuse applies to things detached from the ground, and thus use of attached items generally does not create liability.
Question 3
When is there liability? A non-sacred tree is near sacred land, and its roots enter the field: when is the beneficiary liable for misuse?
Halacha VI clarifies Halacha VI clarifies that in a non-sacred tree near sacred land, if the tree is further than 16 amot — the beneficiary from the roots in the field incurs misuse.
Question 4
What is the ruling? What is the law regarding the incense offering?
Halacha XVI distinguishes Halacha XVI distinguishes between the prohibition of benefit from scent in general and the liability for misuse, which specifically occurs during the ascent of the incense cloud.
Question 5
What is the ruling? A non-Jew consecrated an animal for the altar — what is the law?
Halacha XV states Halacha XV states that in the case of a non-Jew's consecration for the altar, there is no misuse from the Torah, but there is a prohibition of benefit rabbinically.