What is the measure of eating that incurs lashes for the prohibitions in this chapter?
The Rambam reiterates in this chapter that the liability for lashes in eating is based on the measure of a kezayit.
Question 2
What combination of components is explicitly mentioned as contributing to the measure in a burnt offering?
In Halacha 2, it is stated that these five components of the burnt offering combine to form a kezayit for liability.
Question 3
What is the ruling regarding sacred meat that has left its enclosure and then returned?
Leaving the designated area permanently invalidates the meat, based on the law derived from 'meat in a trefa field.'
Question 4
A non-priest who ate the most sacred offerings in the courtyard before the sprinkling of the blood — what is he liable for?
Since in this situation the meat is still not suitable for the priests, there is no liability for transgression, only a prohibition of eating before sprinkling.
Question 5
Why does a non-priest who ate a bird sin offering incur two lashes?
Melika is not a valid slaughter, and thus the bird is considered carrion, while at the same time it is forbidden for a non-priest due to the law of sacred offerings — two prohibitions that apply together.