When a priest thought a mental invalidity regarding the service of the offering but did not perform another act, what is correct according to the chapter?
Rambam states that mental invalidity is forbidden by a negative command, but since thought is not an act, there are no lashes for it.
Question 2
When is there a liability for Karet for eating Pigul?
The obligation of Karet for Pigul is only stated when it involves a sacrificial system that has a permit, and not for every sacred item.
Question 3
What is a correct statement regarding Neter?
האוכל כזית נותר במזיד Liable for Karet.; עצם ההשארה עצמה היא לאו הניתק לעשה ולכן אין עליה מלקות.
Question 4
What is the ruling for a person who is impure and ate sacred meat before the blood was sprinkled?
The chapter emphasizes that full Karet obligations depend on the act of permitting; before it, there is no Karet obligation.
Question 5
What is the relationship between the prohibitions of Pigul, Neter, and impurity when eaten together?
Rambam states that these prohibitions do not cancel each other out and even combine for the required measure according to their laws.