Who’s thought determines the invalidity of the sacrifice in this chapter?
The law states that the thought of the one performing the work is significant; the thought of the owners alone does not invalidate.
Question 2
An invalid priest who received the blood and thought of an invalid time — what is the usual ruling?
Invalid thought depends on a person fit for work; when an invalid performs blood work, their thought usually does not invalidate.
Question 3
Why does foreign thought in the handful of the Omer offering not invalidate, according to the main principle here?
The Omer comes from barley, and therefore does not fit into the regular framework of other Minchot; it lacks the condition of an object fit for that thought.
Question 4
Which thought does not invalidate the sacrifice?
Blood is intended for sprinkling, not for drinking; thinking about eating something inedible is not an effective invalid thought.
Question 5
What is the principle regarding less than a kazait in invalid thought?
Eating and burning require a significant measure; less than a kazait alone does not invalidate, but there are laws of combination in defined cases.