Which of the following options is exactly one of the three thoughts that invalidate mentioned at the beginning of the chapter?
Eating outside its time is one of the three fundamental disqualifications; the other options were provided as examples of thoughts that do not invalidate in this context.
Question 2
What is the central innovation of the Oral Torah in the verse 'And if he eats on the third day'?
The teaching indicates that the thought during the service about eating outside the time creates piggul, even without actual eating.
Question 3
A sacrifice whose blood was sprinkled properly, but its meat remains after the time allowed for eating — what is its principal ruling?
After the blood is sprinkled properly, there is appeasement and atonement; what remains is called leftovers and is forbidden to eat, but does not nullify the appeasement.
Question 4
In which main actions can a disqualified thought invalidate a sacrificial animal?
The chapter establishes that specifically four fundamental actions that permit are the arena of thought disqualification in a sacrificial animal.
Question 5
What is the ruling on a disqualified thought during 'transportation' that is not a legal transportation (such as extending a hand from its standing place)?
Extending a hand is not considered transportation, therefore a disqualified thought at this stage does not contribute to the disqualification; on the other hand, unnecessary walking is considered transportation.